Walleye | Oscar Groove (again)
Say what you will about the conduct of the Academy in recent years, one can not say that they are afraid of changes. Only two years have passed since the change ("The Dark Knight espy 2011 Law"), which increased the number of films the main category candidates from 5 to 10, and now they change espy 2011 the number again. According espy 2011 to the new system, applicants will be between five and ten films, but the exact number will not know until the declaration of the candidates really.
It goes like this. Candidates are selected by a vote of the members of the Academy, this phase can choose any one of the nearly 200 eligible films. Until now, it was relatively simple: five, or ten, films that received the most votes won the nomination - they boast that they are "nominated for an Oscar," Even if a very small percentage of voters really liked them. From now on, will be a minimum number: Apply to film should get at least 5% of the vote. In any case not be less than five or more than ten candidates. Academy will not tell you in advance (and do not know in advance) number of films each year candidates. The statement said the Academy's auditors were re-votes in the last decade, and have found that if this law was applied in recent years, in some years the number of applicants was 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9.
The truth is I liked the 10th Law. Candidates for an Oscar two years was good and varied. Of course, it was clear that at least five of the films are there for decoration only, and have no real chance of winning. The question, of course, is what the movies are the ones that would not apply if this law had been attacked. Which was a shame, for example, "up" and Toy Story 3 ", who managed to break out of the ghettos animation, would not receive nominations, not to mention the chaos of God who breaks while" Start "was deprived. On the other hand I would definitely live in peace without nomination espy 2011 Second Chance "and" The Kids Are Alright ".
On that occasion the Academy complicated category best animated film. To date, they could be three or five candidates in the category, now the number of applicants can be anything from 2 to 5, depending on a number of animated films came out that year.
What does an Oscar nomination for those who have been? Nimrod on 15/06/2011 13:34
Apart from marketing the film in time between the publication espy 2011 of candidates ceremony itself ("nominated for seven Academy Awards"), anyone remember that, over time, the candidates for an Oscar? If The Dark Knight espy 2011 was nominated for an Oscar really good movie (and probably would not have), whether he was remembered in a different espy 2011 way a year or ten years?
And even if the film is still running in the cinema
Also I once talk about it with an American friend, he said he (and family and his friends) know that if a film nominated for an Oscar so he has kind of a standard espy 2011 mark of quality - it's the Oscars, not every movie gets an Oscar nomination, so even if the movie is not great He at least has to be worth something.
Academy laws prohibit unauthorized picture statuette. Only films that won the Oscar statuette are allowed to use this image. Statuette must appear with on a neutral background and with copyright sign AMPAS movies Oscar candidates can specify only words the film was nominated for an Oscar in this category and that.
Special Awards (conferred only by vote of the Academy Board of Governors) must be clearly identified espy 2011 in all advertising by their specific name (Thalberg Award, Sawyer Award, espy 2011 Honorary Award, etc.) and must specify the year in which the recognition was accorded. Special Awards shall not be advertised or exploited in a manner that may cause the public espy 2011 to confuse a Special Award with an Award of Merit voted by the Academy membership. A Scientific and Technical Award may be used in advertising that achievement provided: the year and accomplishment for which the Award was given are included in the advertising, only the image of the award conferred is depicted, and not the Oscar statuette, unless the statuette was the award presented, references to the award are specific as to the classification (ie, Technical Achievement Award, Scientific and Engineering Award or Academy Award / Oscar), and all parties named in the award are included. No film may be advertised or exploited as having "qualified" for an Academy Award or having otherwise been officially recognized by the Academy, except as a Nominee or Winner and in accordance with these Regulations.
Respond
?
?
That is, if we accept the assertion that five films that this film too little value left out - this is just a way to avoid a more logical reason why movies like The Dark Knight and WALL-E espy 2011 were not considered, because the academy has bad taste - then you should find a way to avoid films Kkionim candidates to enter because they just ninth place on the list. Addition of the "threshold" ensures that every film has minimal support candidates among Oscar voters.
Change can not be successful, so successful that movie better not particularly conspicuous, and the vote will be split among a large number of mediocre films - and that's when the number of nominations will be greater. And vice versa - a film or two very popular candidates will reduce the chances of many other movies, even if it was the same year a lot of worthy candidates.
If one film was so good that he took the most votes and therefore only four other films won 5 percent of the vote, I prefer only the best film Oscar candidates than to be films that received less than 5 percent of the vote. It sounds unlikely that the film will not be nominated for an Oscar with only a small percentage of the members of the Academy chose it, even if it is very good for last year's films. What do Oscar ceremony is on an annual basis and will always be as good years and better - still films are measured in relation to other films
Say what you will about the conduct of the Academy in recent years, one can not say that they are afraid of changes. Only two years have passed since the change ("The Dark Knight espy 2011 Law"), which increased the number of films the main category candidates from 5 to 10, and now they change espy 2011 the number again. According espy 2011 to the new system, applicants will be between five and ten films, but the exact number will not know until the declaration of the candidates really.
It goes like this. Candidates are selected by a vote of the members of the Academy, this phase can choose any one of the nearly 200 eligible films. Until now, it was relatively simple: five, or ten, films that received the most votes won the nomination - they boast that they are "nominated for an Oscar," Even if a very small percentage of voters really liked them. From now on, will be a minimum number: Apply to film should get at least 5% of the vote. In any case not be less than five or more than ten candidates. Academy will not tell you in advance (and do not know in advance) number of films each year candidates. The statement said the Academy's auditors were re-votes in the last decade, and have found that if this law was applied in recent years, in some years the number of applicants was 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9.
The truth is I liked the 10th Law. Candidates for an Oscar two years was good and varied. Of course, it was clear that at least five of the films are there for decoration only, and have no real chance of winning. The question, of course, is what the movies are the ones that would not apply if this law had been attacked. Which was a shame, for example, "up" and Toy Story 3 ", who managed to break out of the ghettos animation, would not receive nominations, not to mention the chaos of God who breaks while" Start "was deprived. On the other hand I would definitely live in peace without nomination espy 2011 Second Chance "and" The Kids Are Alright ".
On that occasion the Academy complicated category best animated film. To date, they could be three or five candidates in the category, now the number of applicants can be anything from 2 to 5, depending on a number of animated films came out that year.
What does an Oscar nomination for those who have been? Nimrod on 15/06/2011 13:34
Apart from marketing the film in time between the publication espy 2011 of candidates ceremony itself ("nominated for seven Academy Awards"), anyone remember that, over time, the candidates for an Oscar? If The Dark Knight espy 2011 was nominated for an Oscar really good movie (and probably would not have), whether he was remembered in a different espy 2011 way a year or ten years?
And even if the film is still running in the cinema
Also I once talk about it with an American friend, he said he (and family and his friends) know that if a film nominated for an Oscar so he has kind of a standard espy 2011 mark of quality - it's the Oscars, not every movie gets an Oscar nomination, so even if the movie is not great He at least has to be worth something.
Academy laws prohibit unauthorized picture statuette. Only films that won the Oscar statuette are allowed to use this image. Statuette must appear with on a neutral background and with copyright sign AMPAS movies Oscar candidates can specify only words the film was nominated for an Oscar in this category and that.
Special Awards (conferred only by vote of the Academy Board of Governors) must be clearly identified espy 2011 in all advertising by their specific name (Thalberg Award, Sawyer Award, espy 2011 Honorary Award, etc.) and must specify the year in which the recognition was accorded. Special Awards shall not be advertised or exploited in a manner that may cause the public espy 2011 to confuse a Special Award with an Award of Merit voted by the Academy membership. A Scientific and Technical Award may be used in advertising that achievement provided: the year and accomplishment for which the Award was given are included in the advertising, only the image of the award conferred is depicted, and not the Oscar statuette, unless the statuette was the award presented, references to the award are specific as to the classification (ie, Technical Achievement Award, Scientific and Engineering Award or Academy Award / Oscar), and all parties named in the award are included. No film may be advertised or exploited as having "qualified" for an Academy Award or having otherwise been officially recognized by the Academy, except as a Nominee or Winner and in accordance with these Regulations.
Respond
?
?
That is, if we accept the assertion that five films that this film too little value left out - this is just a way to avoid a more logical reason why movies like The Dark Knight and WALL-E espy 2011 were not considered, because the academy has bad taste - then you should find a way to avoid films Kkionim candidates to enter because they just ninth place on the list. Addition of the "threshold" ensures that every film has minimal support candidates among Oscar voters.
Change can not be successful, so successful that movie better not particularly conspicuous, and the vote will be split among a large number of mediocre films - and that's when the number of nominations will be greater. And vice versa - a film or two very popular candidates will reduce the chances of many other movies, even if it was the same year a lot of worthy candidates.
If one film was so good that he took the most votes and therefore only four other films won 5 percent of the vote, I prefer only the best film Oscar candidates than to be films that received less than 5 percent of the vote. It sounds unlikely that the film will not be nominated for an Oscar with only a small percentage of the members of the Academy chose it, even if it is very good for last year's films. What do Oscar ceremony is on an annual basis and will always be as good years and better - still films are measured in relation to other films
No comments:
Post a Comment